A Year of Pressure on Lawyers: At Least 135 Targeted by Judicial and Security Authorities

HRANA – At least 135 attorneys across Iran were subjected to judicial and security measures between September 2025 and September 2026, including arrests, summonses, prison sentences, bans from practicing law, and travel restrictions. HRANA identified 60 of the lawyers across 14 provinces and documented at least 75 additional cases in which the individuals’ names were not made public. The findings point to a marked escalation in pressure on the legal profession, particularly since January 2026. This report details the arrests, prison sentences, cases of lawyers currently behind bars, collective actions, and other restrictions imposed during the period.

According to HRANA, a review of cases documented between September 2025 and September 2026 shows that actions against attorneys during this period ranged from summonses and the opening of judicial cases to arrests, prison sentences, bans from practicing law, travel bans, and other judicial restrictions.

Among the cases compiled, HRANA verified the identities of 60 lawyers across 14 provinces. In addition, information concerning at least 75 other lawyers whose names have not been made public was documented. A significant portion of these cases involved collective actions against lawyers in East Azerbaijan, Fars, and Gilan provinces.

According to the latest available information, at least five lawyers are currently serving prison sentences, at least 11 others have received prison sentences, and the arrests of at least 34 identified lawyers were documented during the period under review. A number of others have faced summonses, the opening of judicial cases, suspension or revocation of their licenses to practice law, travel bans, and other restrictions.

Report at a Glance

IndicatorNumber / Status
Total number of lawyers documented in the reportAt least 135
Lawyers whose identities have been confirmed60
Lawyers whose identities have not been made publicAt least 75
Geographic scope of identified lawyers14 provinces
Lawyers currently serving prison sentencesAt least 5
Lawyers who have received prison sentencesAt least 11
Identified lawyers whose arrests were documentedAt least 34

January 2026: Peak of the Arrests

A review of the chronological sequence of documented cases shows that following an increase in actions against lawyers in Gilan Province in September 2025, January 2026 marked one of the most significant periods during the year under review.

In January alone, at least 16 identified lawyers were arrested or subjected to judicial and security-related actions. A significant number of these arrests took place amid the nationwide protests in January.

Shima Ghosheh, Mohammad-Hadi Jafarpour, Jafar Zarei, Jafar Keshavarz, Nazanin Baradaran, Enayatollah Keramati, Omid Darabi, Hossein Shokri, Zohreh Javani, Sepideh Taheri, Teymour Salari, Alireza Farzaneh Jajromi, Fatemeh Rouhandeh, Mohsen Darginejad, Amir Bahadorifar, and Masoud Shirmardi Shah-Ghasemi were among the lawyers whose arrests were reported during January 2026.

Some of these individuals were released after a period of detention upon posting bail or other forms of security. However, actions against lawyers continued in the following months, with new cases of arrests, summonses, and the opening of judicial cases documented in February and March.

At Least Five Lawyers Are Currently Serving Prison Sentences

According to the latest available information, Mohammad Najafi, Javad Alikordi, Taher Naghavi, Seyed Mehdi Karimi Farsi, and Golaleh Vatandoust are currently serving prison sentences.

Mohammad Najafi, an attorney imprisoned in Evin Prison, was sentenced by Branch 26 of the Tehran Revolutionary Court to three years in prison, a fine, and a two-year ban on leaving the country and membership in political and social groups in a case opened against him while he was incarcerated. This case is separate from the sentences he was already serving. In April 2025, the Supreme Disciplinary Court for Judges also permanently barred him from practicing law.

Javad Alikordi, an attorney in Mashhad, was arrested on December 12, 2025. Branch 1 of the Mashhad Revolutionary Court sentenced him to a total of 18 years in prison, permanent disbarment from the legal profession, exile, and additional penalties. According to the latest published information, after approximately four months in solitary confinement, he was transferred to Ward 6.1 of Vakilabad Prison in Mashhad.

Taher Naghavi has been imprisoned in Evin Prison since February 2024. His sentence of four years in prison, a two-year travel ban, and two years of deprivation of social rights was upheld on appeal. In October 2025, Branch 6 of the Disciplinary Court of the Center for Lawyers suspended his license to practice law. Another case was opened against him while he was imprisoned in March 2026.

Seyed Mehdi Karimi Farsi was taken to Evin Prison on January 4, 2026, to begin serving his one-year prison sentence. The sentence had previously been issued by Branch 29 of the Tehran Revolutionary Court and was upheld in full by Branch 36 of the Tehran Province Court of Appeals.

Golaleh Vatandoust, an attorney from Marivan, was arrested on May 2, 2026, to begin serving her sentence and was transferred to Sanandaj Prison. She had previously been sentenced to six years, seven months, and 20 days in prison.

Prison Sentences Issued to at Least 11 Other Lawyers

During the period under review, at least 11 attorneys, Nazanin Salari, Mahmoud Taravat-Rouy, Masoud Ahmadian, Elham Zeraatpisheh, Mehdi Ansari, Mehran Ansari, Babak Eslami Farsani, Mohammadreza Faghihi, Saeed Sheikh, Seyed Mohammadreza Razavifard, and Mohammad Tarighat Esfanjani, received prison sentences and, in some cases, additional penalties. Details of the sentences and the latest status of each lawyer are provided below.

In Fars Province, Nazanin Salari, Mahmoud Taravat-Rouy, and Masoud Ahmadian were each sentenced by Branch 1 of the Shiraz Revolutionary Court to three years in prison and a two-year travel ban. The case against the three lawyers had been ongoing since 2020 and resulted in these sentences in June 2026.

Elham Zeraatpisheh was also arrested in May 2026. In July of the same year, Branch 1 of the Shiraz Revolutionary Court sentenced her to five years in prison on the charge of “assembly and collusion against national security” and one year in prison on the charge of “propaganda against the regime.” She was also sentenced to a two-year travel ban and revocation of her passport for two years. In early August, she was released from Adelabad Prison in Shiraz after posting bail.

Mehdi Ansari was also sentenced to imprisonment and a travel ban as proceedings in his case continued. Mehran Ansari, another lawyer arrested during the January protests, was sentenced in late May 2026 by the Shiraz Revolutionary Court to one year in prison on the charge of “propaganda against the regime.”

Babak Eslami Farsani was sentenced in August 2026 by Branch 23 of the Tehran Revolutionary Court to nine months in prison on the charge of “propaganda against the regime.”

Mohammadreza Faghihi had previously received a prison sentence and additional penalties. He was released from Evin Prison in June 2026 after his request for a retrial was granted.

Saeed Sheikh was sentenced in Tehran to one year and six months in prison, a fine, and a one-year ban from practicing law. In November 2025, he announced that 12 months of his prison sentence had been suspended.

Seyed Mohammadreza Razavifard was also sentenced in late June 2026 by Branch 1 of the Qom Revolutionary Court to 10 years in prison on the charge of “propaganda activity against the country’s national security.”

Mohammad Tarighat Esfanjani, a member of the East Azerbaijan Bar Association, was sentenced in June 2026 by the Osku Revolutionary Court to one year in prison on the charge of “propaganda against the regime” and two years in prison on the charge of “insulting the Supreme Leader and the founder of the Islamic Republic.”

Arrests of Lawyers Across Several Provinces

During the period under review, Zahra Naghshineh, Abolfazl Ranjbari, Yilmaz Mehrali Beiglou, Shahrzad Sharbiani, Shadi Falahati, Hesam Pourahmadi, Tahereh Pour Esmaeili, Mohammadreza Tak, Masoumeh Pourshahrani, Hamid Norouzi, Hadi Sharifzadeh, Dariush Ganjehpour Qashqai, Astareh (Maryam) Ansari, Bahar Sahraian, Ebrahim Parsamehr, Nasrin Sotoudeh, Shahab Soleimani, and Bahareh Aghaei were arrested in various provinces. Some of these lawyers were released after a period of detention upon posting bail or other forms of security, while in some cases legal proceedings against them remain ongoing. Details regarding the arrests and the latest status of each individual are provided below.

In East Azerbaijan Province, Zahra Naghshineh was arrested on September 9 after appearing before Branch 15 of the Investigation Office of the Tabriz Public and Revolutionary Prosecutor’s Office. Her case was opened following a report by the Tabriz Intelligence Department concerning her activities and her legal and critical writings.

Abolfazl Ranjbari was arrested in May 2025 and, after approximately one year, was released from Tabriz Prison in May 2026 after posting bail of 50 billion tomans.

Yilmaz Mehrali Beiglou was arrested in Jolfa in July 2025. He was initially transferred to the Ministry of Intelligence’s detention facility in Tabriz and later to Jolfa Prison. He was released after a period of detention upon posting bail. In December of the same year, an interrogation session concerning the charge of “disturbing public opinion” was held at Branch 1 of the Investigation Office of the Jolfa Public and Revolutionary Prosecutor’s Office.

In Gilan Province, Shahrzad Sharbiani, Shadi Falahati, and Hesam Pourahmadi were arrested in September 2025. During the same month, Tahereh Pour-Esmaeili, Mohammadreza Tak, and Masoumeh Pourshahrani were also arrested in Rasht. The three lawyers were released after a period of detention upon posting bail or other forms of security.

In Fars Province, Hamid Norouzi was arrested in Shiraz on February 14, 2026. He was released from Adelabad Prison on February 24 after posting bail.

Hadi Sharifzadeh and Dariush Ganjehpour Qashqai were also arrested in Shiraz during the winter of 2025–2026 and were subsequently released.

Astareh (Maryam) Ansari and Bahar Sahraian were separately arrested in May 2026 and transferred to Adelabad Prison in Shiraz. The two lawyers were released from prison in late July of the same year after posting bail.

In Khuzestan Province, Ebrahim Parsamehr was arrested in June 2025 and transferred to Sheiban Prison in Ahvaz. An indictment was subsequently issued in his case, which was referred to the Ahvaz Revolutionary Court. HRANA continues to investigate his latest status.

Nasrin Sotoudeh was also arrested in Tehran in April 2026 and was later released from the Greater Tehran Prison on a surety bond.

In Kermanshah Province, Shahab Soleimani was arrested by IRGC Intelligence forces in Ravansar County on July 17. According to information received, he was released after a period of detention upon posting bail or other forms of security.

Bahareh Aghaei was also arrested by security forces in January 2026 and transferred to Qarchak Prison in Varamin. According to the latest available information, she has remained in detention for more than seven months without resolution of her legal status.

Collective Actions Against Lawyers in East Azerbaijan, Fars, and Gilan

A significant portion of the 135 cases documented in this report relates to actions taken collectively against groups of lawyers, not all of whose identities have necessarily been made public.

The largest number of collective summonses during the period under review was recorded in East Azerbaijan Province. According to available reports, more than 40 lawyers who are members of the province’s Bar Association were summoned by the Judiciary’s Intelligence Protection Office, and cases were opened against some of them. Charges in some of these cases included “propaganda against the regime” and “spreading false information.”

In Fars Province, Mostafa Ansari, head of the Lawyers’ Support Commission of the Fars and Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Regional Bar Association, stated that following the January 2026 protests, judicial cases were opened against approximately 20 lawyers, 12 of whom were arrested.

In Gilan Province, at least 10 lawyers were summoned by judicial and security authorities, without their names being made public.

An attorney who asked not to be named for security reasons told HRANA that around November 2025, IRGC Intelligence forces went to the offices or homes of a number of lawyers in Gilan Province, including the president and several officials of the province’s Bar Association, and confiscated their mobile phones and other belongings.

According to the source, cases were also opened against two other lawyers. However, no information is available regarding their identities or the details of their cases.

Because the exact number of individuals subjected to these actions during the visits by security forces in Gilan is unclear, these cases were not included in the final total of 135 lawyers.

Summonses, Judicial Cases, and Restrictions on Lawyers’ Professional Activities

In addition to arrests and prison sentences, a number of lawyers during this period faced summonses, the opening of judicial cases, judicial and disciplinary proceedings, and restrictions on their ability to continue practicing law. Reza Tayyebnia, Amir Raisian, Milad Panahipour, Reza Shafakhah, Reza Gharloghi, Iman Soleimani, Hassan Younesi, Khosrow Alikordi, Nasser Rezaei Ahangarani, and Behnam Nezadi were among them. Details of the documented cases involving each of these lawyers are provided below.

Reza Tayyebnia was summoned in August 2026 to Branch 6 of the Assistant Prosecutor’s Office of the Kohgiluyeh County Public and Revolutionary Prosecutor’s Office.

Amir Raisian and Milad Panahipour had judicial cases opened against them in May 2026 at Branch 3 of the Tehran Security Prosecutor’s Office. The charges brought against them were “spreading false information” and “propaganda against the regime.”

Reza Shafakhah received a summons in December 2025 ordering him to appear before District 16 of the Tehran Prosecutor’s Office to defend himself against the charge of “spreading false information.”

Reza Gharloghi, an attorney residing in Karaj, faced disciplinary proceedings in October 2025 following comments he made online. The indictment in his case was referred to Branch 1 of the Disciplinary Court of the Bar Association.

Iman Soleimani, an attorney in Khuzestan, faced a request for the revocation of his license to practice law and renewed disciplinary proceedings in September 2025. He had previously faced charges including “propaganda against the regime,” “insulting religious sanctities,” and “insulting the Supreme Leader,” but the case had been declared closed. Nevertheless, the same evidence was once again referred to the Lawyers’ Disciplinary Court along with a request to revoke his license to practice law. The court acquitted him, but the disciplinary prosecutor appealed the ruling, and the case was referred to the Supreme Disciplinary Court for Judges.

Hassan Younesi was also interrogated at the Culture and Media Prosecutor’s Office in August 2025 and, by judicial order, was prohibited from engaging in online activity for three months.

Khosrow Alikordi, an attorney in Razavi Khorasan Province, was barred from pursuing further education in September 2025. He died on December 5, 2025. Because the action against him occurred within the period covered by this report, his name has been included among the identified lawyers documented in the report.

Nasser Rezaei Ahangarani was assaulted by security forces on the evening of January 3, 2026, during protests in Khorramabad.

Behnam Nezadi also faced judicial proceedings in connection with his work as a lawyer, but was ultimately acquitted by Branch 31 of the Tehran Province Court of Appeals.

Additionally, according to information received by HRANA, since January 2026 at least three other lawyers have received warnings in connection with content published on their personal social media accounts, and their pages were made inaccessible for at least two months. HRANA has not yet verified the identities of these individuals; therefore, these three cases were not included in the report’s final total.

Impact on Access to Legal Representation

The continuation of this trend, in addition to its direct impact on the lawyers involved in these cases, may also affect citizens’ ability to access legal counsel and receive an effective defense. Attorneys play an essential role in safeguarding defendants’ right to a defense in many judicial cases, particularly those involving civil rights and security-related charges.

Conclusion

The data compiled in this report indicate that over the past year, a number of lawyers have faced judicial and security-related actions not merely because of the circumstances of their clients, but also in connection with their own legal activities, public statements, and conduct in their professional capacity as attorneys. Continued monitoring of this trend is essential for assessing the extent to which citizens have independent and unrestricted access to legal services.

Day 35 of the Protests: Pressure on Medical Staff and Lawyers, Continued Arrests

HRANA – According to HRANA’s latest aggregated data on the thirty-fifth day since the start of the protests, the total number of confirmed deaths has reached 6,713. Based on these figures, 6,305 of those killed have been reported as “protesters,” while 137 are under 18. Additionally, 214 members of government-affiliated forces and 57 “civilian, non-protesters” have been reported killed. 17,091 cases remain under investigation. The number of injured civilians stands at 11,021, with 84 student arrests, 295 cases of forced confessions, and 11,028 summonses reported. A total of 662 protest-related incidents have been recorded across 205 cities in 31 provinces.

On the thirty-fifth day, the government’s repression continued on two parallel tracks: intensified pressure on lawyers and medical staff amid a wave of arrests and legal harassment, and the persistence of sporadic, targeted arrests across various cities, alongside the continued use of repressive tactics such as broadcasting “forced confessions” and issuing security summonses.

Crackdown on Lawyers and Doctors

Recent reports indicate that security pressure has not been limited to the streets, but has increasingly targeted individuals who, by virtue of their professions, are responsible for assisting protesters, namely lawyers providing legal representation and defense for detained protesters, and doctors and medical staff treating those injured during the protests.

Arrests of Lawyers and Uncertainty Over Numbers and Charges

Saeed Bagheri, vice president of the Central Bar Association, has said that there is no precise information on the number of lawyers arrested during the recent protests, noting only that it has been “heard that a number of colleagues” have been detained. He also stressed that the exact reasons for the arrests and the nature of the charges have not been clarified to the Bar Association, adding that the case of Shima Ghoosheh is set to be reviewed by a working group.

In this context, Shargh newspaper reported that nine lawyers have been arrested since the start of the protests, writing that two lawyers were detained in Tehran, six in Shiraz, and one in Mashhad. The report also noted that a number of other lawyers have been summoned, without providing full details.

According to the published list, the seven detained lawyers are: Mehdi Ansari, Ja’far Zarei, Mehran Ansari, Ja’far Kashavarz, Nazanin Baradaran, Enayatollah Karamati, and Omid Darabi. HRANA had previously reported the arrest of two other lawyers, Shima Ghoosheh and Mohammad Hadi Jafarpoor.

Regarding Shima Ghoosheh’s case, it has been reported that she was arrested by security forces at her home in Tehran on January 16, and that her family remains in “complete lack of information” about her condition. These reports, together with repeated references to detainees being held in “undisclosed locations,” have intensified concerns over access to legal counsel and the transparency of judicial proceedings.

Heavy Bail, Restrictions on Legal Representation, and Prison Sentences

At the same time, three lawyers spoke to Etemad newspaper, providing details from detainees’ case files that offer a more concrete picture of judicial proceedings:

Zahra Minouei said she is currently handling around 17 cases related to recently detained individuals, most of whom were born in the 2000s. According to her, the charges in these cases are mainly “disrupting public order and tranquility” and “assembly and collusion against the country’s internal and external security.” She also reported the imposition of heavy bail and the continuation of detention even after bail has been granted, noting that in many cases the bail order is not lifted in practice. Minouei added that the sentences issued so far have largely been prison terms, with the shortest sentence reported at seven months and the longest at five years.

Maryam Kian-Arthi said that in many cases, interrogating judges have refused to accept privately chosen defense lawyers. Referring to Article 48 of the Criminal Procedure Code, she explained that during the preliminary investigation stage, only lawyers approved by the head of the judiciary are permitted to represent defendants. She also noted that the legal fees charged by some of these approved lawyers are extremely high and beyond the financial means of families, who in many cases are also unable to provide the required bail.

Hassan Aghakhani said he has so far taken on three cases, all involving the charge of “assembly and collusion against national security.” He stated that the detainees are from Eslamshahr, central Tehran, and Pardis, and that lawyer-client meetings have not yet been allowed. He also cited overcrowded prisons, the lack of transparent information, and difficulties in arranging powers of attorney as ongoing challenges.

Doctors and Medical Staff: Official Narratives Versus Field Reports

Regarding pressure on healthcare personnel, the gap between official narratives and published field reports remains significant. Following reports of doctors and medical staff being arrested after treating those injured during the Dey protests, Mohammad Raiszadeh, head of the Iranian Medical Council Organization, said that 17 doctors with judicial and security cases had “not been arrested due to medical treatment” and that no “final verdicts” have so far been issued against them. While confirming the existence of cases against these individuals, he stressed that no doctor has been detained solely for performing medical duties, adding that the Medical Council has followed up on the matter through security and judicial authorities.

At the same time, Mohammadreza Zafarghandi, Iran’s Minister of Health and Medical Education, said in a message that providing the best possible medical services to every patient in a “safe and hygienic environment” is the priority of the healthcare system, and that this principle underpins the professional conduct of medical staff and forms part of their oath. Similarly, Homayoun Sameh-Yah Najafabadi, a member of Parliament’s Health and Treatment Commission, said he had reviewed a list of detained doctors and found the number of names to be “not small.” However, when asked about the reasons for the arrests, he said he was unaware and claimed he doubted the detentions were related to treating the injured. He also sought to describe medical facilities as “safe,” despite field reports indicating that injured protesters fear going to hospitals.

In contrast to the official narrative, numerous reports have emerged of doctors being arrested after treating injured protesters. Among the names cited are Ameneh Soleimani (a physician and director of a dermatology and hair clinic in Ardabil), Babak Pouramin (an emergency medicine specialist in Neyshabur), and Alireza Golchini (a surgeon from Qazvin). According to accounts from relatives and colleagues, these individuals faced security forces after providing medical care.

In response to the arrests of medical staff, Ahmad Nejatian, head of the Iranian Nursing Organization, said the organization would issue a statement and clarify its position. Additionally, the group “Physicians and the Law” warned in a statement that the “criminalization of medical treatment” contradicts fundamental principles of criminal law, and that issuing heavy sentences against doctors who have merely carried out their professional duties could lead to “judicial intimidation” among medical staff, an outcome that, in times of crisis, both reduces the quality of emergency care and jeopardizes citizens’ right to access medical services.

Arrests and Other Repressive Measures

Alongside pressure on lawyers and healthcare personnel, reports indicate the continued use of street-level and security arrests in various cities, detentions that in some cases have involved transfers to undisclosed locations and, in others, the release of videos of “forced confessions.”

In Iranshahr, it has been reported that three citizens were arrested, including a 17-year-old teenager named Mohammad Ahourani and Amirhossein Kadkhodaei. The same report also mentions the arrest of a woman identified as Fasih Borhanzahi.

Regarding arrests related to teachers, reports state that Behzad Ghavami, a teachers’ union activist based in Sanandaj, has been detained for 21 days, with no information available about his place of detention. Additionally, Mohsen Khodaei, a teacher from Javersian, a village in Khondab County in Markazi Province, was arrested 24 days ago, and no precise information has been released about where he is being held.

In Rasht, the city’s police commander announced the arrest of a “blogger” in connection with the protests. In Lahijan, two protesting citizens were reportedly arrested, and a video of their “forced confessions” was released simultaneously—a video whose recording conditions remain unclear. In addition, the arrest of another citizen in Lahijan has also been reported.

On a broader scale, reports indicate that 430 citizens have been arrested in various cities during the protests. Within this context, the arrests of Amirhossein Heydari (a student at Gorgan University) and Nima Raziani (a resident of Kermanshah) have also been reported. Furthermore, the prosecutor of Eslamshahr announced the arrest of at least 300 citizens in the city, while the Intelligence Department of South Khorasan Province stated that it had detained 128 individuals described as “key elements affiliated with monarchist groups and the Baha’i faith.”

In another development, it has been reported that Mehdi Mahmoodian, Abdollah Momeni, and Vida Rabbani were arrested and transferred to an undisclosed location. According to reports, the arresting authority has not been officially identified, and the three have been described as signatories of the “Statement of 17.”

Statement by the Teachers’ Trade Association

On the thirty-fifth day, the Iranian Teachers’ Trade Association (Tehran) issued a statement condemning the “killing and bloody suppression of protesters,” declaring in unequivocal language: “We stand, with full commitment, alongside the people’s justice-seeking and freedom-demanding aspirations,” and emphasizing teachers’ social responsibility in the face of the current situation.

The statement was released amid simultaneous reports of the arrest of teachers’ union activists and a lack of information about the whereabouts of some detainees, including reports of the arrest of Behzad Ghavami in Sanandaj and the detention of Mohsen Khodaei in Javersian, Markazi province. Taken together, these developments suggest that the professional sphere of education, like other areas of civil society, has come under increasing security pressure.

Beyond condemning the crackdown, the Teachers’ Trade Association’s statement also conveys a practical warning: the continuation of judicial and security measures against professional and civil activists could lead to public distrust and deepen social divides. The association’s emphasis on standing with “justice-seeking and freedom-demanding” demands, set against reports of arrests and case-building, indicates that segments of the professional community are seeking to preserve their own narrative and to warn of the consequences of ongoing repression.

Updated Aggregated Statistics Through the End of Day 35

Fatalities

Protesters: 6,305

Including children: 137

Military/government forces: 214

Non-civilian, non-protesters: 57

Total deaths: 6,713

Cases under review: 17,091

Other Figures

Student arrests: 84

Forced confessions: 295

Summonses: 11,028

Injured civilians: 11,021

Total protest-related locations/incidents in cities: 662

Provinces affected (without repetition): 31

Cities affected (without repetition): 205

Conclusion

The events of the thirty-fifth day since the start of the protests indicate that pressure from security and repressive institutions has spread to broad segments of society: from the arrest and restriction of lawyers involved in legal defense, to the opening of security cases against doctors and conflicting accounts regarding the reasons for their detention. At the same time, sporadic arrests, summonses, and reports related to forced confessions continued. Professional bodies, including the Teachers’ Trade Association, issued statements warning of the consequences of sustained repression.