UN Special Rapporteur: Islamic Republic Responded to January Protests with Gunfire, Internet Shutdowns, and Threats of Execution

HRANA – Mai Sato, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the human rights situation in Iran, in her latest report to the Human Rights Council, has highlighted the violent suppression of nationwide protests in January, widespread internet and communications shutdowns, and the worsening human rights crisis in Iran following military attacks by Israel and the United States. She emphasized that the use of lethal force against protesters, concealing the scale of the crackdown through communications blackouts, and the use of charges carrying the death penalty to silence dissent have been key elements of this crisis.

According to HRANA, Mai Sato’s latest report, presented today, Monday, March 16, at the 61st session of the United Nations Human Rights Council, reviews the human rights situation in Iran between January 2025 and February 2026. However, its main focus is the nationwide protests that began on December 28, 2025.

Sato states that “severe economic hardship ignited demonstrations that rapidly spread into a nationwide movement spanning all 31 provinces, with people from diverse ethnic, religious and socioeconomic backgrounds, including children, demanding fundamental change in governance.”

In the report, Iran’s government’s response to the protests is described as “some of the most severe violence deployed against protesters in
recent history.” Sato writes that she has received numerous accounts indicating the excessive and lethal use of force against protesters, including the use of military weapons and shotguns, firing from elevated positions, and targeting vital areas of the body such as the head and chest. She stresses that shooting into unarmed crowds and the use of lethal force are incompatible with international standards and states that the government’s official narrative portraying the protests as “terrorist” activity is not supported by the available evidence.

One of the most important sections of the report concerns the number of those killed. According to a statement by Iran’s Supreme National Security Council on January 22, authorities of the Islamic Republic announced the death toll at 3,117 people. However, Mai Sato’s report—citing HRANA—states that at least 7,015 confirmed deaths had been recorded by February 15. This figure includes at least 6,508 protesters, among them 226 children, and 214 members of security forces. In addition, the report notes that 11,744 other deaths are still under review. Sato emphasizes that even this conservative estimate is more than twice the official figure released by the government, and that the gap between official statistics and field data adds to the suffering of families who are still searching for their loved ones.

In one case specifically highlighted in the report, Sahand Naseri, a 15-year-old teenager who was shot in the chest and killed during protests in Karaj, is presented as a symbol of a young generation that took to the streets with hope for the future but was met with deadly violence. Sato uses this case to illustrate the deep gap between the government’s official narrative and the human reality of the protests.

The report also presents a concerning picture of the situation of detainees. Sato writes “the total number of current detainees connected to the nationwide protests remains unknown, leaving families with no certainty about whether their loved ones are alive and, if so, where they are being held.” According to the report, Iranian domestic media reported on January 16 that around 3,000 people had been arrested, but data collected by civil society organizations suggests “that total arrests may run into tens of thousands, with arrestees including protesters, medical professionals, children and students, artists and writers, lawyers, journalists, and human rights defenders. By mid-February, the judiciary’s spokesperson confirmed over 10,500 people had been referred for prosecution and nearly 9,000 indicted. Most worryingly, at least 30 individuals, including two children aged 17, are reportedly facing the death penalty in connection with the nationwide protests, following expedited judicial proceedings.”

Another major focus of the report is the communications blackout and internet shutdown. Sato states that on January 8, 2026, the Iranian government “imposed a near-total shutdown of telecommunications services nationwide. Both international connectivity and significant elements of domestic communications were disrupted. The shutdown significantly disrupted protest coordination and access to emergency services, financial transactions and essential communications, leaving many families unable to determine the fate or whereabouts of detained or injured relatives for days. The imposition of telecommunications shutdowns in parallel with the use of force, discussed below, creates conditions that shield human rights violations from scrutiny.”

Sato describes this situation as evidence of the use of “communications infrastructure as an instrument of repression.” She considers the National Information Network, control over access to the global internet, the collection of user data, and new restrictive policies to be part of a broader strategy in which access to information is treated not as a right but as a revocable privilege. The report adds that the blackout has also had severe economic consequences, with some small and medium-sized businesses losing up to 80 or 90 percent of their income.

Another prominent part of the report addresses violations of medical neutrality. Sato states that during the protests, hospitals and medical centers, rather than serving as safe spaces for the wounded, became sites of repression, identification, and arrest. The report notes that security forces entered hospital wards, beat or detained doctors and nurses, confiscated patient lists, and even prevented the treatment of injured individuals. In a stark conclusion, Sato writes that the result has been the creation of a healthcare environment in which “many injured protesters abandoned treatment out of fear of arrest,” and saving lives has effectively been criminalized.

The report also addresses the broader human rights situation in Iran and points to an unprecedented increase in executions. According to the report, at least 1,639 people were executed in Iran in 2025, a figure that represents a significant increase compared to the previous year. Sato warns that security-related charges carrying the death penalty, such as moharebeh (enmity against God), efsad-e fel-arz (corruption on earth), and espionage, are increasingly being used as tools to suppress political dissent, and that the same pattern is now visible in cases related to the nationwide protests.

In the final section of the report, Sato also refers to developments that occurred after the report had been finalized, noting that the human rights situation in Iran has worsened following military attacks by Israel and the United States. She describes these attacks as inconsistent with the United Nations Charter and as violations of the principle prohibiting the use of force, while also expressing concern about Iran’s retaliatory attacks in the region. According to the report, attacks on civilians, schools, and medical facilities have been among the incidents reported following these developments. At the same time, conditions in prisons have also deteriorated, including severe shortages of food and medical services for prisoners. Sato stresses that “illegal military intervention should not be mistaken for a solution to the human rights situation in Iran,” and that any resolution must be based on the rule of law, the will of the Iranian people, and full accountability for documented violations.

In conclusion, the UN Special Rapporteur describes the nationwide protests of winter 2025 as a defining moment in Iran’s human rights crisis—a moment that, in her words, has exposed the structural nature of repression in the Islamic Republic: from the use of lethal force against protesters and internet shutdowns to attacks on hospitals, forced confessions, mass arrests, and the use of the death penalty to intimidate society. She calls on Iranian authorities to release all detainees held for the peaceful exercise of their fundamental rights, clarify the fate of the missing, end internet shutdowns and digital repression, and conduct independent and impartial investigations into the killings and other violations that have occurred.

It is worth noting that gatherings and strikes by shopkeepers and bazaar merchants began on Sunday, December 28, in Tehran, and after two days expanded beyond markets and commercial centers. With the participation of students, citizens, and various social groups, the protests became one of the largest waves of demonstrations in recent years. Following the crackdown on the protests by law enforcement and security forces, thousands of people were killed or injured, and tens of thousands were arrested or summoned by security institutions. For more information, readers can refer to HRANA’s comprehensive report titled “Crimson Winter,” which documents the first fifty days after the start of Iran’s nationwide protests.

The Crimson Winter: A 50 Day Record of Iran’s 2025–2026 Nationwide Protests

HRANA- Published today, this comprehensive report examines developments during the first fifty days following the eruption of nationwide protests in Iran on December 28, 2025, providing a detailed account of the unfolding events and the state response from December 2025 through February 2026.

Compiled through a coordinated, multi team documentation effort across HRA’s news agency HRANA, Spreading Justice, the Pasdaran Documentation Project, and the Statistics Department, the roughly 1,350 page report preserves a structured record of the opening phase of Iran’s 2025–2026 nationwide protests and the state response.

The findings are derived from more than 143,330 HRANA reports drawn from confidential and open sources, collected, verified, and analyzed during the 50-day window.

Download the full report in PDF format.

Why this report, and why now?

Large scale protest cycles generate two parallel dynamics: an unprecedented volume of documentation and a coordinated effort by state authorities to restrict communications, shape narratives, and intimidate sources. In this environment, the central risk is not only undercounting violations, but losing the ability to verify identities, locations, dates, and patterns while evidence remains recoverable.

This report adopts a disciplined human rights methodology centered on documenting minimum verifiable cases rather than publishing maximal estimates. It presents findings that can be substantiated through corroborated evidence, even where the broader scale of violations likely exceeds what can be confirmed in real time. The publication is intended both as a public record and as an archival foundation for legal analysis and future accountability processes.

What the report contains

The report maps the first fifty days of protests by addressing core accountability questions:

1. How did protests evolve and spread geographically

2. How did state forces respond, and through what structures

3. What forms of harm occurred

4. How did blackout conditions affect the availability, quality, and verification of information

5. How was content authenticated and cross checked in an environment shaped by surveillance, source risk, and restricted access

6. How were risks from manipulated, fabricated, or AI generated content identified and mitigated within the verification process

7. How can documented patterns be legally characterized

8. How can records, especially identities of victims and detainees, be preserved without increasing risk

Sections analyze protest trends and geography, university mobilization, slogans, the structure and tools of repression, patterns of violations including killings, injuries, arrests, coerced confessions, pressure on families, and attacks on medical neutrality, as well as legal analysis, international responses, and how HRA documentation initiatives mobilized.

At the center of the report are two core pillars: the verified accounting of those killed, including children, and the documented accounting of detainees, including minors, students, and individuals subjected to group arrests.

Key Findings

Geographic scope

• Total protest locations: 682

• Unique cities: 203

• Unique provinces: 31

The geographic distribution demonstrates that both protest activity and state response were nationwide in scope.

Student mobilization

• University protests documented: 55

• Protesting universities: 36

Universities emerged as central civic spaces within the broader protest movement and the state response.

Fatalities: scale and composition

Across the first fifty days covered by this report, consolidated documentation records:

• Protesters killed: 6,488

• Children killed, counted separately and not included among protesters: 236

• Civilians killed, non-protester: 76

• Military and government forces killed: 207

• Total fatalities: 7,007

An additional 11,744 cases remain under review and are not included in confirmed totals. Separately, HRA documented eight civilian deaths resulting from clashes between civilians in public. The categorical separation is deliberate. Distinguishing protesters, children, non-protester civilians, and government or pro-government fatalities prevents analytical conflation and enables clearer legal and statistical interpretation. The figures reflect a minimum verifiable record compiled under conditions where comprehensive access is not possible.

Injuries

• Injured military and security forces: 4,884

• Injured civilians: 25,846

These figures contextualize the breadth of harm beyond confirmed fatalities and illustrate the overall magnitude of violence.

Arrests

• Total arrests: 53,777

• Children, teenagers, and school students arrested: 555

• University students arrested: 147

Arrest figures include both individually identified cases and verified group arrests, reflecting documentation realities in which names are often unavailable or unsafe to publish.

Forced confessions

• Documented forced confessions: 369

The report treats coerced confessions as a systematic instrument of intimidation and narrative control within a heavily surveilled and restricted media environment.

Summonses

• Documented summonses: 11,053

Summonses function as a parallel mechanism of legal pressure, extending state control beyond those formally detained.

The List of the Deceased: Methodology and Protection

Appendix A contains the list of the deceased. Publication decisions are governed by a protection centered framework that weighs the public interest in disclosure against the risk of retaliation for relatives, witnesses, and HRANA’s network.

Where names are published, they are paired, where possible, with core identifiers including age, location, and documentation anchors used in verification. Entries are also paired with sources. Where a third-party source is listed as the primary source, HRANA has independently verified the information through its reporting network.

Where publication would create unacceptable risk, cases are reflected in verified totals and preserved within secure documentation systems for accountability purposes.

The list is the product of a structured, cross-checked verification methodology designed to preserve an accurate public record without increasing danger to those inside the country.

Legal Assessment and Accountability Relevance

The report includes a preliminary legal assessment, framing documented patterns as potential violations of international human rights law and, where applicable thresholds are met, international criminal law.

Patterns of lethal force, mass arrests, coerced confessions, and related violations are analyzed against legal standards governing the right to life, due process, freedom of expression and assembly, and protections against torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment.

By grounding its legal analysis with verified names, dates, locations, and corroborated patterns, the report connects documentation to concrete pathways for accountability.

 

Day 42 of Protests: Wave of Arrests and Intensified Security Crackdowns

HRANA – According to the latest aggregated data compiled by HRANA up to the end of the forty-second day since the beginning of the protests, a total of 675 protest-related incidents have been recorded across 210 cities in 31 provinces. Based on these figures, the total number of confirmed fatalities has been reported as 6,961, of whom 6,507 are registered as “protesters,” and 178 are among the fatalities categorized as children under the age of 18. Additionally, 214 members of government-affiliated forces and 62 individuals listed under the category of  non-protester civilians have been reported. The number of cases listed as “under investigation” has been announced as 11,630. During the same period, the number of injured civilians reached 11,021, total arrests amounted to 51,465, student arrests numbered 112, forced confessions totaled 311, and summonses reached 11,048.

On the forty-second day, repression continued in various forms: the continuation and expansion of security and judicial crackdowns against protesters and their supporters, ranging from political activists and journalists to medical staff, students, adolescents, and citizens in various cities. At the same time, reports emerged of raids on homes, seizure of communication devices, blocking of bank accounts, fabrication of cases and the filing of serious charges, as well as the killing of a wanted protester during an attempted arrest.

Chain arrests and charges against political activists and other citizens

As part of the ongoing arrests linked to the protests, Ghorban Behzadian-Nejad, a senior advisor to Mir-Hossein Mousavi and one of the signatories of the 17-person statement, was arrested in Tehran. Reports also recalled that Abdollah Momeni, Mehdi Mahmoudian, and Vida Rabbani, other signatories of the same statement, had previously been arrested.

At the same time, the East Azerbaijan General Directorate of Intelligence announced the arrest of 48 citizens in connection with the nationwide protests, stating that these arrests took place in cities including Tabriz, Sahand, Miyaneh, Basmenj, and Jolfa. Separately, official media also reported the arrest of more than 17 citizens linked to the protests in the provinces of Alborz, Kermanshah, and Kurdistan.

Reports also documented mass arrests in various other locations. One report on the arrest of three citizens stated that Mohammad Hadi Mahimeni was arrested in Gorgan, Omar Mohajer in Chabahar, and Raheleh Moini in Tehran. The same report noted that Raheleh Moini is being held in Qarchak Prison in Varamin, while Mohammad Hadi Mahimeni is detained in Gorgan Prison.

Another report announced the arrest of at least six citizens, including a minor: Mani Vafadar (a 17-year-old adolescent) in Bojnurd; Fardin Javanbakht and Hamed Karimkhah in Bushehr; and Jaber Taqvaei, Saeed Javanbakht, and Ali Taqvaei in Yasuj. According to the published information, Mani Vafadar, following his arrest in Bojnurd, is currently being held at the Juvenile Correction and Rehabilitation Center in that city. Further details regarding the timing of some arrests indicate that Fardin Javanbakht and Hamed Karimkhah were arrested on 16 Bahman in Bushehr, while Jaber Taqvaei, Saeed Javanbakht, and Ali Taqvaei were arrested on January 9 in Yasuj.

Meanwhile, reports also emerged of scattered arrests in several other cities. Among the names mentioned were Ali Shaeri, Mohammad Shakeri, and Ali Babari (in Esfarayen); Yaser Ghaffarnezhad (in Yasuj); Aref Khanzadeh (in Bojnord); Shahab Naderi (in Kermanshah); and Arshia Amin Javaheri (a student in Isfahan). The report also mentioned the arrests of Dana Rasoulpour and Hejar Bariki. Additional explanations stated that the identities and places of residence of some of these individuals, among them Ali Shaeri, Mohammad Shakeri, and Ali Babari (residents of Esfarayen), and Yaser Ghaffarnezhad (a resident of Yasuj), have been confirmed.

Additionally, official media reported on the holding of a court session for Mohammadreza Tabari, one of those arrested during the recent protests. One of the charges brought against him was cited as “enmity against God through armed action,” indicating that the process of case-building against some detainees is being steered toward more severe charges.

“Pressure on media and journalists”: home searches, phone confiscation, and bank account freezes

As the wave of security crackdowns on the media continues, reports indicate that security forces searched the home of Azadeh Mokhtari (a journalist), confiscated her mobile phone and identification documents, and barred her from using social media platforms.

In another report, Kianoush Darvishi (a journalist) stated that following a summons to the Cyber Police (FATA), his bank accounts were frozen. According to his account, the accounts were blocked without the case being referred to a court and solely based on a letter from the Cyber Police. The reason for his summons was reportedly attributed to publishing an “Instagram story of corpses.”

Reports also emerged of continued pressure on other media activists. Among them, it was noted that during a search of the home of Yalda Moaiery (a photographer), some of his electronic equipment was confiscated. The continued detention of several others in different cities was also reported, including Pedram Alamdari and Somayeh Heydari in Tabriz, Hassan Abbasi in Bandar Abbas, and Artin Ghazanfari in Mashhad.

Within the same context, the Iranian Writers’ Association expressed concern over the situation of two of its imprisoned members, Yousef Ansari and Ali Asadollahi, warning about their continued detention and the handling of their cases.

“Pressure on medical staff”: arrests of Medical Council members and crackdowns on protesting healthcare workers

Pressure and threats by security forces against medical staff continue. Mohammad Raiszadeh, head of the Iranian Medical Council Organization, announced that 33 members of the organization have been arrested in connection with the protests. He stated that so far 11 detained members in cities including Shiraz, Ardabil, Qazvin, Golestan Province, and Tehran have been released, but according to the latest figures, 23 individuals remain in detention.

Reports have also emerged regarding the arrest of healthcare workers. Among them is the arrest of Saber Dehghan (a neurosurgeon in Sirjan), who, according to reports, was arrested on January 2 while treating protest-injured patients at a hospital, following an altercation with security agents. At the time of this report, no clear information has been published regarding his condition or the charges against him.

Alongside these cases, numerous reports continue to highlight concerns among medical staff and accounts related to security pressures affecting the treatment of the injured, a trend that could further restrict safe access to medical services for those wounded during the protests.

“Seizure of assets and blocking of communications”: targeting well-known figures and symbolic repression

As part of the continued measures against prominent figures, reports indicate that the assets, bank accounts, and mobile phone line of Voria Ghafouri (former football player and coach of Esteghlal) have been seized and blocked. The same report also refers to the sealing of two cafés owned by him in Tehran, known as Cafe Voria, cafés that had been closed during the peak days of the protests (January 8 and 9). These actions were reported despite the fact that Ghafouri had previously expressed support for protesters on social media in response to the crackdowns.

“Death during arrest”: killing of Sadegh Ashtari and arrest of co-defendants

In another report, IRIB announced the killing of Sadegh Ashtari, one of the citizens wanted in connection with the Tehranpars protests, during his arrest following gunfire by security forces. It was also stated that 15 individuals described as his “co-defendants” were arrested. The release of a related video, without clear details regarding the circumstances of its recording, has been raised amid increasing reports of forced confessions and coerced videos in protest-related cases.

Market stagnation and the persistence of social anxiety

In the economic sphere as well, reports indicate that markets in many areas have not returned to normal conditions. A report on the Alaeddin and Chaharsoo shopping centers (among the main hubs for mobile phones and accessories) notes that despite shops being open, the market remains stagnant. Foot traffic is largely limited to shopkeepers, and the sound of customers is rarely heard in the corridors. The report also points to a heavy security presence, with agents visible around and inside the malls, and describes an intensified sense of anxiety within the business environment.

Updated (aggregated) statistics up to the end of Day 42 since the start of the protests

• Total recorded protest-related incidents: 675

• Number of cities (no repetition): 210

• Number of provinces (no repetition): 31

• Injured civilians: 11,021

• Total arrests: 51,465

• Student arrests: 112

• Forced confessions: 311

• Summonses: 11,048

• Total protesters killed: 6,507

▪️ Including children: 178
▪️ Military/government forces: 214
▪️ Non-civilian, non-protester: 62

• Total confirmed fatalities: 6,961

• Cases under investigation: 11,630

Summary

Day forty-two unfolded with systematic repression remaining the dominant trend, reflected in widespread and scattered arrests, intensified pressure on key social groups, including journalists, writers, medical staff, and students, and the expanded use of control measures such as home searches, confiscation of phones and identity documents, restrictions on online activity, bank account freezes, and case-building involving severe charges. Alongside these developments, the reported killing of a wanted protester during arrest and the persistence of a heavy security presence in public and economic spaces underscore a deepening crisis and the escalating human and social costs of the protests.

Nationwide Protests: 247 Citizens Arrested in Various Cities

HRANA – The General Directorate of Intelligence of Yazd and Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari provinces, in two separate statements, announced the arrest of 188 and 85 citizens respectively in connection with the nationwide protests of January 2026. Meanwhile, Mahmoud Heydarian, an art teacher at schools in Bojnord, was arrested on January 10 during nationwide protests in the city of Ashkhaneh and has recently been transferred to Bojnord Prison.

According to Etemad Online, the Intelligence Department of Yazd Province announced that so far 188 individuals identified as the main activists in the January protests, more than 70 of whom were described as “street leaders and primary saboteurs involved in setting fire to public places and government offices”—have been identified, arrested, and had judicial cases opened against them.

According to Nournnews, in a separate report, the General Directorate of Intelligence of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province also announced the identification and arrest of more than 85 citizens in connection with the nationwide January protests. In a statement, this security body described these individuals as leaders of the protests in the province.

Additionally, in another report, the Coordinating Council of Iranian Teachers’ Trade Associations announced that Mahmoud Heydarian, an art teacher in Bojnurd, was arrested by Intelligence Ministry agents at his home in the city of Ashkhaneh around midnight on January 10, during the nationwide protests. According to the council, after undergoing interrogation at the provincial intelligence office, he was transferred to Bojnurd Prison.

Nationwide Protests: 140 Protesters Arrested in Various Cities

HRANA – State media reported the arrest of additional protesters: 85 protesting citizens were detained in Zanjan Province, 12 in Tehran, and 43 in Yazd Province. At the same time, forced confessions by six of those detained in Tehran have been released, though it is unclear under what conditions they were recorded.

In a statement, the Zanjan Provincial Intelligence Department described these citizens as “leaders of the protests” and claimed that “firearms and incendiary materials” were discovered in their possession.

Meanwhile, the Young Journalists Club reported the arrest of 12 citizens in Tehran’s Sattarkhan district. This outlet has published a video containing confessions by six of these individuals, though it is not known under what circumstances the footage was obtained.

The Commander of the Law Enforcement Forces of Yazd Province also announced that 43 individuals described as the “main agents behind announcing and disseminating widespread calls on social media” were arrested during the protests by the FATA Police and the Intelligence Organization of the Yazd Provincial Law Enforcement Command.

These reports do not mention the identities of those arrested or their places of detention.

It is worth noting that gatherings and strikes by shopkeepers and bazaar merchants began in Tehran on Sunday, December 28, and after two days expanded beyond bazaars and commercial centers. With the participation of students, citizens, and various social groups, these protests have become one of the most widespread demonstrations of recent years. For more information, readers can refer to HRANA’s detailed report published last night on the thirty-third day since the start of the protests.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Now is definitely not the time to stop reading!

Nationwide Protests: Over 300 Citizens Arrested in Semnan

HRANA – The governor of Semnan announced that more than 300 citizens have been arrested in connection with the recent protests in the province.

According to Tasnim News Agency, the governor of Semnan stated that more than 300 individuals have been detained in the province, and that other cases are being handled and legally reviewed through the posting of bail and written commitments. He described those arrested as the “main ringleaders of the unrest.”

This report does not provide details regarding the identities of the detainees, their place of detention, or the charges brought against them.

It is worth noting that gatherings and strikes by shopkeepers and bazaar merchants began in Tehran on Sunday, December 28, and after two days extended beyond bazaars and commercial centers. With the participation of students, citizens, and various social groups, these protests became one of the most widespread demonstrations in recent years. For more information, readers may refer to HRANA’s detailed report on the twenty-ninth day of the protests, which was published last night.

Day 20 of Protests: Continued Internet Blackout and Human Rights Groups Focus on Documenting the Crackdown

HRANA – By the end of the twentieth day of the protests, the total number of confirmed deaths has reached 3,090, with 3,882 additional cases still under review. At least 2,055 people have been reported with severe injuries, and the number of arrests has risen to 22,123. The continuation of the nationwide internet shutdown, intensified diplomatic and security reactions at the international level, and the persistence of security and judicial crackdowns inside the country were among the most notable developments of the day.

Alongside developments on the ground, foreign reactions, centered on concerns over the human rights situation, the withdrawal of diplomats, and increased political pressure, continued. Domestically, government officials, while blaming foreign actors, emphasized a security-based narrative of the protests.

Disruption of Communications

The widespread shutdown and disruption of communications, which began on the evening of January 8, continued into the twentieth day and, according to reports, has entered its second week after more than 190 hours. During this period, access to both fixed-line and mobile internet in large parts of the country has faced severe restrictions, with messaging services, internet calls, access to public information, and media communications cut off.

The consequences of this situation have gone beyond limitations on information flow. Reports indicate difficulties for citizens in accessing basic services (including online banking and administrative services), heightened concern among families about the condition of detainees, and increasing obstacles to documenting and following up on human rights violations. At the same time, the internet shutdown has posed serious challenges to field verification and the collection of evidence.

Some foreign institutions and officials have explicitly emphasized that cutting communications can facilitate the concealment of violence and repression. Inside the country as well, scattered reports have emerged of increased security controls over access to information and intensified pressure on alternative communication channels.

In response to this information vacuum, HRANA today issued a public call urging citizens, eyewitnesses, and individuals with access to reliable documents, images, and videos to participate in the independent documentation of the protests. Emphasizing the vital role of citizen witnesses under conditions of internet shutdown, the call stressed the need to prevent the distortion of facts and to accurately record human rights violations.

International Reactions

At the international level, Iran remained at the center of attention. In the United States, the U.S. president stated that Iran had refrained from carrying out more than 800 execution sentences due to political pressure, remarks that were accompanied by renewed calls to halt violence against protesters.

In Europe, the cancellation of invitations to officials of the Islamic Republic to attend the Munich Security Conference drew widespread attention and was seen as a sign of Iran’s growing diplomatic isolation. At the same time, some governments expressed concern over the safety of their nationals in Iran and advised them to leave the country or reduce the level of diplomatic presence.

Continuing these reactions, a number of governments and international bodies once again emphasized the need for accountability for perpetrators of human rights violations. In this context, international documentation and accountability initiatives have received increased attention, a development directly linked to the situation on the ground and communication restrictions in Iran.

Alongside growing international focus on accountability, legal documentation projects have also gained greater importance. Within this framework, Spreading Justice, HRA’s database of human rights violators in Iran, announced that information received about human rights violators, after multi-layered verification, will be recorded in the form of documented case files and legal analyses, to serve as a basis for international legal action and to counter the systematic impunity of human rights violators.

Government Responses

In response to external pressure, Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs condemned the G7 statement on the suppression of protests as “interventionist.” At the same time, Iranian officials have sought to justify the crackdown by emphasizing security imperatives and asserting its legal basis, while rejecting or downplaying international criticism.

Meanwhile, in several high-profile cases involving detainees, Iran’s judiciary has stated that the charges do not necessarily carry the death penalty. At the same time, law enforcement and judicial authorities have continued to emphasize a policy of “swift and harsh” responses to protests, a stance that has intensified concerns over escalating violence, mass arrests, and mounting pressure on detainees’ families.

Statistics Through the End of Day 20

By the end of the twentieth day, based on aggregated recorded data:

• Number of protests recorded: 619 (across 187 cities in 31 provinces)

• Total confirmed deaths: 3,090

Of these, at least 2,885 were protesters, 165 were government/security forces, and 21 were non-protesting civilians

Children (under 18) among the deceased: at least 19

• Deaths under review: 3,882

• Severely injured: 2,055

• Arrests: 22,123 cases

• Broadcast forced confessions: 132 cases

Conclusion

The twentieth day was marked by the continuation of the nationwide internet shutdown, which entered its second week, alongside escalating diplomatic and security pressure on the Islamic Republic. Internationally, developments ranging from formal meetings to governments advising their nationals to leave Iran reflected growing concern over the situation in the country. Domestically, the persistence of hardline security and judicial positions has reinforced fears of increased violence and intensified repression.

Day Eighteen of the Protests: Global Focus on Casualties and Mass Arrests Amid Communications Blackout

HRANA’s aggregated figures indicate the registration of 617 protest gatherings in 187 cities across the country, the arrest of at least 18,470 people, and the confirmed deaths of 2,615 individuals, a situation that, alongside the decline in verifiable on-the-ground evidence, has intensified international concerns over the scale of the crackdown.

HRANA – The eighteenth day of Iran’s nationwide protests passed amid a continued shutdown of communications with the outside world. HRANA’s aggregated figures indicate the registration of 617 protest gatherings in 187 cities across the country, the arrest of at least 18,470 people, and the confirmed deaths of 2,615 individuals, a situation that, alongside the decline in verifiable on-the-ground evidence, has intensified international concerns over the scale of the crackdown.

The eighteenth day of the nationwide protests unfolded while Iran’s disconnection from the global internet persisted, and access to verifiable field evidence remained limited compared to the peak days of the demonstrations. In this context, developments on this day focused primarily on the continued communications blackout, rising casualty and arrest figures in aggregated data, and the escalation of international reactions and positions regarding the situation in Iran.

With the ongoing internet shutdown, the ability to receive and verify field reports from inside the country continued to face serious disruption. On the eighteenth day, no verifiable reports of newly registered street protests were available, a situation that may reflect either a decline in visible street demonstrations or the direct result of severe communications restrictions and the difficulty of independent documentation.

At the same time, media outlets and monitoring organizations remained focused on the human and security consequences of the protests. Aggregated data show that although the flow of field information has slowed, the upward trend in the number of casualties, injured individuals, and arrests has continued, an issue that, particularly amid the communications blackout, has heightened concerns about the true extent of violence and repression remaining concealed.

At the international level, reactions became more pronounced on the eighteenth day. The President of the United States stated that he had been “informed” that killings and executions in Iran had stopped, remarks that, given the continued security atmosphere and reports of rising casualties, were met with skepticism and critical responses. At the same time, several European governments, citing security assessments, reduced their diplomatic presence in Tehran or advised their citizens to leave Iran.

Within this framework, the President of the European Parliament also issued a message addressed to the people of Iran, urging them not to lose hope and emphasizing the support of European institutions for human rights and civil demands. Meanwhile, critical positions by governments and international bodies regarding the suppression of protesters, internet shutdowns, and mass arrests continued, alongside warnings about the human rights consequences of the situation.

HRANA’s Aggregated Statistics up to the End of Day Eighteen

According to HRANA’s aggregated data up to the end of the eighteenth day of the protests, a total of 617 protest gatherings have been recorded nationwide. These demonstrations took place in 187 cities and covered all 31 provinces of the country.

In terms of arrests, the detention of 18,470 individuals has been confirmed. In addition, the number of broadcast forced confessions has reached 105 cases, and 2,054 injured individuals with severe injuries have been reported.

Regarding human casualties, the total number of confirmed deaths has been announced as 2,615. Of these, 2,435 were protesters, and the deaths of 13 children under the age of 18 have been confirmed. Additionally, 14 non-protesting civilians are recorded among the fatalities. On the other side, 153 members of security forces and government supporters have lost their lives. Furthermore, 882 additional deaths remain under investigation.

Brief Background

The nationwide protests began on December 28, 2025, and, after reaching their widest geographical spread in the middle days, entered a new phase following the government’s imposition of communications shutdowns, one in which the collection and independent verification of field data has become structurally more difficult. The eighteenth day followed this same pattern and was defined less by clear, verifiable signs of street protests and more by a communications blackout, a sharp increase in aggregated figures for casualties and arrests, and an intensification of international pressure and reactions.

Day Thirteen of the Protests: Nighttime Demonstrations Continue Amid Internet Shutdown

HRANA – Iran’s nationwide protests continued into their thirteenth day amid a widespread internet shutdown. According to HRANA reports, over the past 13 days at least 65 people have been killed, 2,311 individuals have been arrested, and protests have been recorded at 512 locations across 180 cities in 31 provinces. On this day, despite severe restrictions on the flow of information, reports indicated the continuation of nighttime gatherings, an intensification of security crackdowns, and an increase in judicial threats against protesters.

Nationwide protests continued on the thirteenth day, Friday, January 9, while a broad internet blackout severely limited the dissemination of news and the verification of events. Nevertheless, a collection of citizen reports and media coverage pointed to the continuation of nighttime protests in Tehran and several large and small cities. At the same time, security responses intensified, including reports of gunfire, the use of tear gas and pellet shotgun rounds, as well as explicit judicial threats against protesters. Some indications of disruptions to international flights or flight returns, along with official travel warnings issued by foreign governments regarding travel to Iran, were also reported.

Background and Drivers of the Protests

On the thirteenth day, the underlying drivers of the protests remained a combination of political and governance-related grievances and economic pressures. Field reports and published accounts particularly emphasized the following:

• Livelihood crisis and the collapse of the national currency’s value: Some accounts explicitly referred to economic hardship and difficulties in meeting daily needs. Within the protests themselves, the link between street demonstrations and livelihood-related grievances was especially prominent.

• Continuation of the nighttime protest pattern: Calls for nighttime presence and chanting (including from within neighborhoods and from rooftops) continued to be reflected in several cities as a lower-cost method of participation.

• Rising security and judicial costs of participation: Official threats of arrest, “identification at homes,” and the filing of serious judicial charges became more pronounced that same day as tools of deterrence and intimidation.

Geographic Scope and Focal Points of the Protests

Reports received from Tehran indicate that the protest pattern on the thirteenth day was neighborhood-based and dispersed, yet dense. The dominant pattern included “localized neighborhood gatherings and chanting,” “scattered reports of gunfire and a heavy security atmosphere,” and “symbolic actions (such as setting fire to banners and billboards).” Neighborhoods in Tehran that witnessed protests on the thirteenth day included Chitgar, Moshiriyeh, Punak, Ashrafi Esfahani, Qeytarieh, West Ferdows Boulevard, Tehranpars, Rahahan Town (Railway Town), and Moqaddas Ardabili Street.

In addition to Tehran, received reports also indicate protests in the cities of Mashhad, Tabriz, Shiraz, Abhar, Zahedan, and Karaj.

Based on reports compiled up to the thirteenth day of the protests, 512 locations nationwide across 180 cities in 31 provinces have witnessed demonstrations. Thirty-five universities have also taken part in these protests.

Distribution of Protests Day 13

Fatalities and Victims of the Protests

Although on the thirteenth day, due to communication shutdowns and the lack of independent access, it has not been possible to definitively establish an exact death toll, HRANA’s verified reports assess the total number of fatalities over the past 13 days as follows:

• Total deaths: 65
• Protesting citizens: 50
• Children and adolescents (under 18): 7 of the 50
• Law enforcement and security forces: 14
• Government-affiliated civilian: 1

Among the deceased, the provinces of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari, Ilam, Kermanshah, and Fars, with a combined total of 38 fatalities, rank highest in protest-related deaths.

At the same time, the head of the judiciary in North Khorasan announced that the prosecutor of Esfarayen, along with a number of law enforcement and security forces in the county, had been killed. According to the official account, the portable cabin where they were stationed was set on fire, and “rescue operations were not permitted.”

In addition to those killed, numerous reports have emerged of citizens being injured during street clashes and security operations. However, due to restricted access to field information and ongoing communication disruptions, the exact number of injured individuals is still being compiled.

Arrests and Escalation of Security Crackdowns

Arrest Trends

According to aggregated recorded data, by the end of the thirteenth day of the protests, at least 2,311 arrests have been confirmed or reported. Of these, 624 were individual arrests and 1,687 were mass arrests, indicating the predominance of large-scale, on-the-ground detention patterns during security operations.

The temporal distribution of arrests shows a significant surge from the seventh day onward. The highest number of daily arrests occurred on the tenth day of the protests, followed by the seventh and eighth days, a pattern consistent with the intensification of security presence and coinciding with the expansion of strikes and nighttime gatherings.

Among those detained, at least 167 children, adolescents, and school students, as well as 48 university students, have been recorded, reflecting the widening scope of crackdowns across different age groups and social sectors. In addition, 50 cases of forced confessions have been reported during the protest period, assessed as part of security and media pressure tactics.

Internet shutdowns in Iran have had a serious impact on the speed of verification, information gathering, and identification of detainees. As a result, only 34 newly detained individuals were identified by HRANA today, a sharp decline compared to previous days.

Judicial and Security Threats

Alongside the rise in arrests, official judicial and security positions were articulated in more explicit and forceful language. The Tehran Public and Revolutionary Prosecutor announced that individuals accused of “destruction and arson of public and private property” would be charged with moharebeh (enmity against God) and dealt with “decisively.” In explaining this stance, he referred to incidents from the previous night in Tehran, including the burning of an ambulance, a bus, and a mosque, emphasizing a policy of “zero tolerance.”

Within the same framework, the head of the judiciary warned that punishments for those labeled as “rioters” would be imposed to the maximum extent and without leniency, a position viewed as further increasing the cost of participation in protests.

In the communications sphere, the Ministry of Communications issued a statement saying that the internet shutdown was a decision made by competent security authorities, linking it to the “prevailing conditions.” This position was announced as numerous reports simultaneously documented a widespread nationwide internet blackout.

Alongside these official stances, reports also emerged indicating police and security warnings about identifying, warning, and arresting individuals who chant slogans inside their homes, a narrative suggesting that part of the security pressure has shifted from public streets to private and non-field spaces.

Universities and the Role of Students

Based on aggregated data, 35 universities have witnessed protest activity over the past twelve days, with 47 student gatherings recorded on university campuses. The temporal distribution shows that the peak of student protests occurred on the third, tenth, and eleventh days.

However, on the thirteenth day, no new university gatherings were reported, a development that may be attributed to the intensification of security pressure and control policies in higher education institutions.

Within this context, patterns of university control through postponements, shifts to online instruction, and physical restrictions became more pronounced. A notable example is the Khwarazmi University women’s dormitory (Hesarak campus in Karaj), which, according to reports, received orders for immediate evacuation. Student accounts attribute this action to university management’s concern over the spread of protests on campus.

Forms of Protest and Slogans

On the thirteenth day, protest tactics remained diverse and multi-layered. Street demonstrations and neighborhood-based protest presence, particularly at night, alongside strikes and market closures in several cities, constituted the most prominent forms of protest. This pattern indicates that demonstrations have not been confined to a single format and, under security pressure, have been reproduced in lower-cost and more decentralized forms.

At the field level, reports described neighborhood gatherings, continuous car horn honking, temporary road blockages, and symbolic actions.

At the same time, reports of tear gas use by security forces and, in some areas, the sound of gunfire were published, indicating the continued on-the-ground pressure exerted on protest gatherings.

Summonses and Security Pressure Beyond the Streets

Alongside street-level confrontations, data and reports from the thirteenth day indicate an expansion of security pressure beyond public spaces. Open threats regarding the identification and punishment of individuals chanting slogans inside their homes, an increase in reports of the arrest of activists, particularly in sensitive areas, and judicial warnings of harsh crackdown all point to efforts to contain the protests through social, psychological, and judicial control.

In the professional and commercial sphere, reports indicate that shopkeepers were contacted and pressured to reopen their businesses. At the same time, judicial cases were initiated against certain individuals and business units on charges of directly or indirectly supporting protest calls.

Internet Disruptions and Communication Restrictions

The communications blackout was one of the central features of the thirteenth day. Internet access was widely cut off from the previous evening, and according to technical data, national connectivity dropped to around one percent of normal levels, a situation described by internet-monitoring bodies as a violation of fundamental rights and a tool for concealing violence.

NetBlocks also confirmed the situation as a widespread internet shutdown.

In response, the Ministry of Communications stated that the decision to cut internet access was security-related and promised follow-up efforts to restore services. At the same time, reports emerged of severe disruption or complete loss of mobile phone signals in cities such as Karaj, Khorramabad, Nishapur, and Bijar, further restricting field coverage and the flow of information.

Reactions

1. Domestic Reactions (Governmental)

In response to the continuation of protests and the spread of strikes and nighttime gatherings, a series of official positions were issued by government officials, security institutions, and the judiciary. A common thread among many of these statements was the securitization of the protests and an emphasis on decisive action.

Ali Khamenei, warning against what he described as “destructive acts,” stated that the Islamic Republic would “not back down” in the face of such actions and stressed the need to confront them. This position is assessed as part of an effort to draw a formal distinction between “protest” and “destruction” and to legitimize security crackdowns.

On the diplomatic front, Abbas Araghchi downplayed the likelihood of any foreign military intervention in Iran’s developments, describing it as a “failed experience.” At the same time, Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs characterized the support and statements of U.S. officials and some Western countries as “interventionist,” framing the protests as Iran’s internal affairs.

In the judicial–security domain, the judiciary and law enforcement bodies once again emphasized harsh, deterrent, and uncompromising measures against protesters. These stances were accompanied by announcements of case-building against certain individuals, as well as monitoring of cyberspace and professional and economic activities.

2. Domestic Reactions (Non-Governmental, Civil, and Social)

In contrast to the official narrative, a number of religious, civil, cultural, artistic, and sports figures reacted to the suppression of protests through messages and statements.

Molavi Abdolhamid described the protests as a “popular uprising for major change,” emphasized the right to peaceful protest, and called on demonstrators to avoid destruction and violence. At the same time, he urged security forces to stand with the people and refrain from repression.

In the cultural and artistic sphere, 184 Iranian filmmakers issued a joint statement condemning the suppression of protests and describing the shooting of unarmed people as a “crime against the right to life.” The House of Cinema also stated that, in the absence of effective channels for expressing dissent, people have “no path but the streets,” and described violence against protesters as illegitimate.

Among academic and social figures, statements and commentaries were published focusing on a governance crisis, the need for dialogue with the public, and the release of detainees. Some civil activists, pointing to the arrest of children, adolescents, and students, called for an end to security crackdowns on vulnerable groups.

In the fields of sports and performing arts, figures such as Voria Ghafouri and Alireza Faghani, along with others, expressed solidarity with protesters through messages or symbolic actions. Critical positions taken by some well-known figures were also met with reactions and attacks from media outlets close to the authorities.

3. Foreign and International Reactions

At the international level, the continuation of protests and reports of repression received widespread attention. The leaders of France, Germany, and the United Kingdom issued a joint statement condemning the killing of protesters and calling for restraint, respect for freedom of expression, and the right to assembly.

The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights called for “independent, transparent, and impartial” investigations into the deaths and expressed concern over internet shutdowns and restrictions on access to information.

In Europe, the European Parliament president and a number of its members issued supportive messages emphasizing solidarity with protesters and the need to prevent repression. Some European officials also assessed the internet shutdown as an attempt to conceal violence.

Donald Trump also commented on several occasions about the possibility of a harsh response if protesters were killed, and claimed that some of the deaths were the result of crowd congestion.

Detainees

Individual Arrests with Confirmed Identities

  1. 1. Salam Aref Khanlari – Place of arrest: Darreh Shahr (Ilam Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  2. 2. Bardia Darvishi – Place of arrest: Gilan-e Gharb (Kermanshah Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  3. 3. Behnam Bolandbakht – Place of arrest: Gilan-e Gharb (Kermanshah Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  4. 4. Vahid Shadman – Place of arrest: Qasr-e Shirin (Kermanshah Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  5. 5. Ali Shah Shirmohammadpour – Place of arrest: Gilan-e Gharb (Kermanshah Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  6. 6. Navid Najafi – Place of arrest: Gilan-e Gharb (Kermanshah Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  7. 7. Armin Pirani – Place of arrest: Abdanan (Ilam Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  8. 8. Ali Ahmadi – Place of arrest: Abdanan (Ilam Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  9. 9. Behnam Fathi – Place of arrest: Yasuj (Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: HRANA

  10. 10. Rahmat Rashidi – Place of arrest: Abdanan (Ilam Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  11. 11. Behrouz Sheikhi – Place of arrest: Abdanan (Ilam Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  12. 12. Ashkan Sabzi – Place of arrest: Abdanan (Ilam Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  13. 13. Arman Karami – Place of arrest: Abdanan (Ilam Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  14. 14. Aref Mirzaei – Place of arrest: Abdanan (Ilam Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  15. 15. Amirhossein Khan-Mohammadi – Place of arrest: Abdanan (Ilam Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  16. 16. Mostafa Saffar – Place of arrest: Abdanan (Ilam Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  17. 17. Saeed Abolhasani – Place of arrest: Nishapur (Razavi Khorasan Province) – Place of detention: Nishapur Prison – Current status: Detained – Source: HRANA

  18. 18. Ehsan Ahmadi – Place of arrest: Dehloran (Ilam Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  19. 19. Hossein Karami – Place of arrest: Dehloran (Ilam Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  20. 20. Mohammad Moradi – Place of arrest: Dehloran (Ilam Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  21. 21. Ahmad Khosravi – Place of arrest: Dehloran (Ilam Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  22. 22. Ahmadi Zeini – Place of arrest: Dehloran (Ilam Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

Mass Arrests or Arrests Without Identity Confirmation

  1. 1. Seven citizens – Place of arrest: Lorestan Province – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: State Broadcasting (IRIB)

  2. 2. Four citizens – Place of arrest: Hamedan (Hamedan Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Young Journalists Club – Notable point: Forced confessions

  3. 3. One citizen – Place of arrest: Hamedan (Hamedan Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Young Journalists Club – Notable point: Under 18 years old; forced confessions

In Conclusion

  1. 1. Protests on the thirteenth day simultaneously displayed three prominent characteristics: neighborhood-based dispersion (particularly in Tehran) and high levels of violence in certain areas (such as Fardis and Zahedan).

  2. 2. The internet shutdown, as a central tool of control and concealment, effectively disrupted verification and access to information, while at the same time limited circulation of some videos continued through alternative channels.

  3. 3. The judicial and security apparatus, by emphasizing serious charges along with arrests and identification efforts, sought to raise the cost of participation; nevertheless, signs of continued social mobilization (from the streets to the marketplaces) remained visible.

  4. 4. Alongside domestic developments, international pressure and reactions, ranging from European statements to calls for UN investigations, intensified, further highlighting Iran as a crisis of human security and governance.

 

A Report on the Twelfth Day of Nationwide Protests in Iran: Widespread Strikes, Internet Shutdown, and Surge in Arrests

HRANA – Nationwide protests in Iran continued on their twelfth day, Thursday, January 8, 2026, according to reports collected by HRANA. Demonstrations and protest actions were recorded in at least 46 cities across 21 provinces. At the same time, a wave of strikes and market closures was reported, particularly in Kurdish regions, with dozens of cities in Kurdistan, West Azerbaijan, Kermanshah, and Ilam provinces joining the strikes.

On the twelfth day of the nationwide protests, at least 60 additional arrests were recorded. This brings the total number of detainees over the past 12 days to more than 2,277 individuals. Among those arrested, at least 166 were under the age of 18 and 48 were university students. During the same period, 45 cases of forced confessions were broadcast by state media.

Alongside these developments, reports indicated a nationwide internet shutdown on the twelfth night of protests, as well as targeted disruptions to infrastructure, including a sharp drop in IPv6 connectivity. These measures led to widespread disruptions in mobile internet access, internet-based calls, and the functioning of circumvention tools. The death toll from the past 12 days of protests has reached 42 people, including five minors under 18 and eight security personnel or officers.

Background of the Protests

The current protests began on December 28, 2025, amid accumulated social and economic grievances, and gradually expanded from trade- and market-based demands to street protests, later spreading into university spaces. Continued economic pressure, declining purchasing power, and a sense that public demands are being ignored, alongside a deep lack of trust in official accountability mechanisms, have been described as the main drivers behind this wave of unrest.

In the following days, the pattern of protests shifted from scattered gatherings to a network of demonstrations, nighttime chants, and market strikes. By the twelfth day, widespread strikes and shop closures, alongside street protests, had emerged as one of the most prominent features. At the same time, the increased presence of security forces and intensified crackdowns, including mass arrests, the airing of forced confessions, and restrictions on communications (internet shutdowns or signal disruptions), have pushed much of the situation into an environment marked by information disruption and competing narratives.

In parallel, reported slogans indicate that demands have not remained confined to economic issues. In many locations, they have evolved into political protests and structural criticism. Within this context, the twelfth day of protests can be seen as a continuation of a phase in which the street, the bazaar, and civil actions have operated simultaneously and in a complementary manner, while the government has sought to contain both the scope of the protests and their public reflection through a combination of on-the-ground control, judicial and security pressure, and communication restrictions.

Nationwide protests Day 12

Geographic Scope and Key Focal Points of the Protests

Reports collected from various sources indicate that on the twelfth day of the protests, demonstrations and protest activities continued in at least 46 cities across 21 provinces.

In Tehran, numerous locations were reported as sites of street presence and scattered gatherings by protesters. These included Aryashahr and Sadeghieh, Narmak, Valiasr, Keshavarz Boulevard, Yousef Abad, Azadi Street (Eskandari intersection), Tehranpars, Nazi Abad, Sattarkhan, Haft-Hoz, Gheytariyeh, Vanak, Punak (from Esfahani Square to Marzdaran), Kashani Boulevard, Taleghani Square, and Shahrak-e Azadi. In addition, reports were published of nighttime chanting from inside homes in the Heravi area, as well as neighborhood-based protests in Saadat Abad and Jannat Abad. Some reports also referred to street gatherings in Islamshahr.

Furthermore, HRANA received reports of shop closures and strikes in the Tehran Grand Bazaar and central districts of the city, coinciding with the concentration of security forces around Sabzeh Meydan, Amir Kabir Street, and along the metro route from 15 Khordad Station to the Naser Khosrow–Sabzeh Meydan intersection.

In a number of cities, reports were published of internet or electricity disruptions, as well as the sound of gunfire being heard.

According to the compilation of reports received by HRANA, gatherings and protests on the twelfth day took place in cities including Sanandaj, Kermanshah, Marivan, Kamyaran, Ravansar, Sarpol-e Zahab, Saqqez, Mahabad, Paveh, Hamedan, Bukan, Isfahan, Bijar, Dehgolan, Piranshahr, Eslamabad-e Gharb, Ardabil, Ilam, Takab, Sarableh, Sarvabad, Qorveh, Lumar, Pir Bakran, Borujerd, Kerman, Kalachay, Shiraz, Abadan, Astaneh Ashrafieh, Tehran, Gachsaran, Behbahan, Tabriz, Islamshahr, Mashhad, Karaj, Babol, Dezful, Shahin Shahr, Gorgan, Ahvaz, Rasht, Damghan, Iranshahr, and Robat Karim.

Fatalities and Victims of the Protests

According to updated data, by the end of the twelfth day of the protests, at least 42 people had lost their lives. This figure includes:

• 29 protesting civilians
• 8 security–military forces
• 5 children and adolescents (under 18 years old)

The presence of children among those killed has once again highlighted serious concerns regarding how security forces are confronting the protests and whether the principle of proportionality in the use of force is being observed.

In addition to those killed, numerous reports have been published regarding citizens injured during street clashes and security operations. However, due to limited access to field information and ongoing communication disruptions, the exact number of injured individuals is still being compiled.

Universities and the Role of Students

Based on aggregated data, 34 universities have so far been involved in the protests, with a total of 46 gatherings held on university campuses. Nevertheless, no reports of demonstrations at universities were received today.

In terms of security responses, collected data indicate that over the past 12 days, at least 48 students have been arrested. Alongside this broader trend, notable developments in the university sphere today include the following:

Amirkabir University of Technology: It was reported that end-of-term exams have been postponed for one week, citing the “current special circumstances.”
Ministry of Health: An official source claimed that “only one medical sciences student” has been arrested, and that this arrest occurred “outside the university environment.”
University of Tehran: The university’s Student Council reported the arrest of Parsa Ghobakhloo, an undergraduate student of electrical engineering, by security forces, stating that his whereabouts are unknown and that the detaining authority has not been identified.

Forms of Protest and Slogans

On the twelfth day of protests, forms of protest action remained diverse. Street gatherings and visible protest presence in urban centers, alongside strikes and market closures in a number of cities, were among the most prominent expressions of dissent. The continuation of this pattern,particularly during nighttime hours and under conditions where internet disruptions or outages and power blackouts were reported in some areas, indicates that the protests have not been confined to a single fixed form, but continue to reproduce themselves through varied methods.

At the ground level, reports point to a combination of scattered and decentralized actions, including neighborhood-based protests, temporary blockages of certain routes and disruptions to traffic, as well as the use of symbolic and low-cost methods to express dissent. At the same time, in several cities, security forces were reported to have used tools such as tear gas to disperse gatherings, and in some areas, the sound of gunfire further intensified the security pressure surrounding the protests.

In terms of content, the slogans and messages raised can largely be categorized into two main themes: some reflect livelihood-related grievances and economic pressures, while others relate to structural and political criticism of governance, the lack of accountability of official institutions, opposition to state repression and violence, and demands for regime change. This simultaneity suggests that, in the minds of protesters, the economic crisis and the crisis of governance are understood as two interconnected aspects of the same underlying problem.

Arrests and Intensified Security Crackdowns

According to collected data, at least 60 additional arrests were reported or confirmed today. As a result, the total number of detainees over the past 12 days has risen to more than 2,277 people. However, due to limited access to field information and incomplete reporting from some areas, the actual number of arrests is likely significantly higher. During the same period, it has also been reported that 45 cases of forced confessions by detainees have been broadcast. Among those arrested, at least 48 are students and 166 are under the age of 18.

Alongside the increase in arrests, signs of escalated on-the-ground repression have been reported in several cities. Reports from Kermanshah indicate the violent arrest of protesters by plainclothes agents. In Behbahan and Ardabil, witnesses have also reported gunfire by security forces.

In addition to street-level crackdowns, a number of official and governmental actions and positions point to an expansion of security and judicial repression. Among these, security bodies in Azna (Lorestan Province) claimed to have arrested an “organized network,” attributing it to monarchist groups, and alleged that the network was involved in the “recruitment of young women” and the “distribution of Lion and Sun flags and promotional materials.” In Tehran, the judiciary announced the opening of cases against “certain individuals” as well as “brands and shops” on charges of direct or indirect support for protest calls. At the same time, reports cited an order by the Tehran prosecutor to monitor cyberspace and identify individuals or cases deemed to be in violation.

At the field level, reports have emerged of widespread use of tear gas, including in Shahin Villa (Karaj), Ghaemshahr, Khorramabad, and Maragheh, as well as gunfire in several cities. These include aerial gunfire in Bijar, reports of repeated gunshots in Khorramabad, and heavy gunfire in Behbahan. In Gohardasht, Karaj, severe communication disruptions and signal outages were also reported simultaneously with clashes.

Summonses and Security Pressure Beyond the Streets

Alongside street-level repression, reports from the twelfth day indicate an expansion of security and surveillance pressures beyond public demonstrations. These pressures range from media threats and psychological operations to judicial tools, phone calls, text messages, and informal summonses. Their stated aim has been described as controlling narratives, preventing the continuation of protests, and monitoring professional, labor, and media circles.

Within this framework, Tasnim News Agency (close to security institutions) published a threatening video attributed to the FARAJA Intelligence Organization, claiming that “individuals chanting slogans from inside their homes” had been identified, warned, and would be arrested “if necessary.” In a statement attributed to the same body, it was emphasized that “all activities are under intelligence surveillance” and that action against chanting from homes would continue.

At the same time, in the economic and trade sphere, reports indicate that The Ministry of Intelligence’s detention facility contacted some shopkeepers and threatened them to reopen their businesses.

In the realm of judicial pressure and digital surveillance, the opening of cases against certain individuals and brands or shops in Tehran has been cited as another example of repression outside the streets, an approach linked to monitoring cyberspace and efforts to curb direct or indirect support for protest calls.

Regarding narrative control and restrictions on content production, it has been reported that some protesters, civil activists, and journalists have been threatened or informally summoned through anonymous phone calls and text messages, warning them against taking positions or producing content related to the protests.

At the international level, in relation to the domestic media environment, the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) has condemned the actions of security institutions in summoning and threatening journalists. The organization stated that following remarks by Ali Khamenei regarding repression, journalists were contacted and summoned to security bodies, including the IRGC.

Internet Disruptions and Communication Restrictions

On the twelfth night of the protests, it was reported that the internet was shut down nationwide, a situation that NetBlocks also confirmed as a widespread internet outage. In follow-up reports, NetBlocks warned that Tehran and several other cities were entering a state of “digital blackout,” and also reported a complete internet shutdown in Kermanshah Province. Within this framework, it was reported that on Thursday, January 8, disruptions, severe slowdowns, and repeated outages continued in a large number of cities.

At the same time, published technical data indicate a pattern of targeted disruption of IPv6. According to reports, Filterban announced that a significant portion of IPv6 connections went offline around 15:19 Tehran time, with the timing pattern suggesting a coordinated action. In the same vein, Cloudflare Radar reported that the volume of IPv6 addresses dropped by approximately 98.5%, and the share of IPv6 traffic fell from around 12% to about 1.8%. It was further emphasized that disruption of this protocol can directly affect mobile internet, modern browsers, applications, internet-based calls, and even the functioning of a significant number of VPNs and circumvention tools. According to these reports, some VPNs either failed to connect or effectively stopped working.

At the field level, and based on specific reports received for January 8, communication restrictions were reported in several cities as follows:

Bijar (Imam Boulevard): Intermittent internet connectivity.
Khorramabad: Reports of internet shutdown and inability to send videos.
Neyshabur: Reports of a complete internet shutdown, with only text messages being sent with great difficulty.
Karaj (Gohardasht): Initially a complete internet shutdown in the early evening hours; later, mobile phone signal was cut to the extent that calls and SMS stopped working, with reports indicating that only landline phones remained usable.
Amol: In addition to communication disruptions, reports of power outages on main streets were raised, which as an environmental restriction further complicated communication and field coverage.

Strikes and Labor Protests

On the twelfth day of protests, alongside street demonstrations, an unprecedented expansion of strikes and market closures was reported. This pattern took shape from the early days, beginning with the protests on December 28 and reports of gatherings or protests by some shopkeepers in the Tehran Grand Bazaar, and then rapidly spread to numerous cities. On this day, strikes in many areas took the form of shop closures, market shutdowns, and merchants joining street protests.

Kurdish Regions and Kurdistan

Reports indicate widespread strikes in Kurdish- and Lur-inhabited areas, with dozens of cities across four provinces, Kurdistan, West Azerbaijan, Kermanshah, and Ilam, joining the strikes. At the city level, strikes by shopkeepers were reported in cities such as Sanandaj, Bukan, Kamyaran, Dehgolan, Saqqez, Qorveh, Paveh, Sarvabad, Ravansar, Eslamabad-e Gharb, Sarpol-e Zahab, and Kerend-e Gharb.

Tehran and the Bazaar Axis

In Tehran, reports point to the continued closure and stagnation of several markets and commercial centers, alongside the heavy deployment of security forces in parts of the city’s central and commercial districts. Some reports identified routes and locations such as Sabzeh Meydan, Amir Kabir Street, and the entrance of the 15 Khordad metro station up to the Naser Khosrow–Sabzeh Meydan intersection as focal points of security presence—conditions that, according to sources, could affect citizens’ movement and the normal functioning of the markets.

Cities and Markets Reported on Strike (Selected Examples)

In addition to Kurdish regions and Tehran, strikes and shop closures of varying scope were also reported in a range of other cities, including Arak, Hamedan, Khorramabad, Abyek (Qazvin), Borujerd, Qazvin, Isfahan, Ardabil, Bandar Abbas, Bandar Deylam (Bushehr), Shiraz, Khomeini Shahr, Karaj, Shahreza, Nurabad-e Mamasani, Kazerun, Tabriz, Urmia, and Zanjan.

International Reactions

As the protests continued, a number of international officials and figures responded to developments in Iran. Donald Trump warned on several occasions that if the Iranian government “starts killing people like it did in the past,” it would face a “severe blow,” and he emphasized the “value of freedom” in his remarks. Additionally, quoting a White House official (Wednesday, January 7), it was stated that the U.S. president had explicitly said that if the Iranian government shoots peaceful protesters or severely beats them, it will face a “severe blow,” describing this as a “promise.”

In the same context, J.D. Vance stated that “we stand with anyone who peacefully protests for their rights.” The House Foreign Affairs Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives (majority) also warned that if Tehran violently kills peaceful protesters, “justice will be swiftly served.”

The U.S. Department of State (including its Persian-language account) issued a travel advisory stating that Iran remains at Level 4 – Do Not Travel, urging U.S. citizens to “under no circumstances” travel to Iran. The advisory cited risks such as terrorism, unrest, kidnapping, and wrongful detention. It has also been reported that Australia has urged its citizens to leave Iran.

In Europe, Roberta Metsola, President of the European Parliament, expressed solidarity with protesters and, referring to reports of “30 killed,” emphasized that threats, prison, and tear gas cannot suppress the desire for freedom. Hannah Neumann (Chair of the European Parliament’s Iran delegation) also stated that people have returned to the streets and may face bullets, but for many, “silence is more dangerous,” stressing the need to “shine a light” on events in Iran.

Meanwhile, Canada’s foreign minister expressed support for the right to protest and voiced concern over repression and violent crackdowns. Germany’s foreign minister (Johann Wadephul) condemned the “excessive use of violence against protesters” and emphasized the right to peaceful protest and Iran’s obligation to uphold its international commitments.

Domestic (Governmental) Reactions

In response to the continuation of protests, a range of official and media positions were released at the level of the government, security–judicial institutions, and media close to the authorities. A significant portion of these responses focused on securitizing the protests and attributing them to foreign interference.

At the diplomatic level, Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs described the support and positions of senior U.S. officials as “interventionist and deceptive,” claiming that the United States is pursuing a range of tools including psychological warfare, media operations, the spread of disinformation, threats, and incitement to violence. In the same framework, Abbas Araghchi emphasized that “Iran’s internal issues concern no one but the Iranian people,” framing the protests as “domestic affairs.” Along these lines, some official statements sought to portray the protests as purely economic demands, while simultaneously attributing part of the problems to U.S. sanctions.

In the media and propaganda sphere, the newspaper Kayhan, using labels such as “Mossad and ISIS agents,” attempted to portray protesters as a security threat, while also speaking of “harsh” judicial and security crackdown as the path forward. The repeated official dichotomy of “protest” versus “riot” was also highlighted in various statements as a red line in government discourse.

At the parliamentary and security-institution level, reports emerged of a closed-door parliamentary session attended by the government and security/law enforcement bodies, during which it was said that “statistics, charts, and provincial maps” of the protest situation were presented. In the narratives of some lawmakers, concepts such as “hybrid warfare” and “behind-the-scenes enemy planning” were emphasized, and it was claimed that the government had been “tasked with engaging in dialogue with the people and calming them.” It was also reported that one MP (Mohammad Bayat) claimed that “the use of weapons has occurred only in cases where the country was harmed”, a claim described as being in contradiction with field accounts and human rights reports, particularly regarding gunfire.

In statements by the government and the judiciary, Masoud Pezeshkian called on security forces to refrain from “targeting protesters,” while the government spokesperson used emotional language to describe the pain of “every drop of blood being spilled.” The head of the judiciary, addressing merchants’ strikes, described them as “defenders of the system” and sought to avoid framing strikes or discontent as opposition to the authorities. At the same time, in certain judicial-security measures, emphasis was placed on monitoring cyberspace and confronting the symbolic economy of protest, including opening cases against “brands or shops” and “public figures”, as tools to curb protest calls and indirect support.

Regarding the official narrative on casualties and security, the judiciary-affiliated outlet Mizan reported the killing of a police officer in Malard. In another reaction, the Ministry of Health claimed that arrests in university environments had been very limited and that only “one medical sciences student” had been arrested, and that this arrest had occurred “outside the university environment.”

Domestic Reactions (Civil Society, Labour Groups, and Public Figures)

As the protests continued, a series of statements by professional and civil groups, along with positions taken by critical cultural, sports, and political figures, were published. A shared theme across many of these responses was the condemnation of repression, an emphasis on the right to protest, and solidarity with protesters.

Statements and Organizations

In the field of arts and culture, 184 Iranian filmmakers issued a statement condemning the crackdown on protests, emphasizing that shooting unarmed people constitutes a “crime against the right to life,” and affirming their support for freedom of expression. The Iran Cinema House also stated in a separate declaration that people find no avenue other than the streets to voice their protests, describing violence against protesters as illegitimate, unlawful, and irrational.

Today, child rights organizations likewise condemned violence against children and called for the release of detained children and adolescents.

Regarding labor and professional protests, widespread strikes and shop closures were reported in Kurdish regions. These strikes were mainly documented in cities such as Ilam, Kermanshah, Sanandaj, Marivan, Saqqez, Mahabad, Bukan, Oshnavieh, and Sardasht.

Public Figures

Among well-known figures, a range of supportive and critical positions were expressed. Mohsen Makhmalbaf, in a supportive text, emphasized national solidarity and criticized individual dictatorship. Mohammad Fazeli proposed a “democratic bargain with the people” as a path forward. Parsa Pirouzfar, by raising a critical question about the “limits of humiliating and crushing people’s bodies and spirits,” reacted to the atmosphere of repression.

Among sports figures, Voria Ghafouri expressed solidarity and announced that he would close his café for today and tomorrow. Hamid Derakhshan, Mehdi Ghaedi, Mostafa Mastour, Alireza Faghani, and Rasoul Khadem also voiced support for the protests through messages or videos.

At the political and social level, Shirin Ebadi stressed solidarity and described the protests and strikes as unprecedented and nationwide. Azar Mansouri condemned the “repressive approach” toward protesters, described the situation as a “crisis of governance,” and called for the release of detainees, especially women, youth, adolescents, and students. Zahra Rahnavard, in a message using mournful language, referred to the “young lives cut down,” reiterated the slogan “Do not be afraid… we are all together,” and emphasized the transition to democracy.

In addition, references were made to positions and controversies surrounding Ali Daei, whose criticism of government performance and the economic situation, including remarks such as “eggs becoming a luxury item”, was met with reactions and media attacks. Mojtaba Mehrami also made statements expressing support for Mohammad Reza Shah and a positive view of the Pahlavi era.

Arrests

Individual Arrests with Confirmed Identities

  1. 1. Issa Foroughi – City of arrest: Dehdasht (Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province), Gachi village – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: HRANA

  2. 2. Jaber Foroughi – City of arrest: Dehdasht (Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province), Gachi village – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: HRANA

  3. 3. Iman Foroughi – City of arrest: Dehdasht (Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province), Gachi village – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: HRANA

  4. 4. Jamal Askari – City of arrest: Dehdasht (Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province), Gachi village – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: HRANA

  5. 5. Asghar Vahdat – City of arrest: Dehdasht (Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province), Gachi village – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: HRANA

  6. 6. Pouya Barati – City of arrest: Dehdasht (Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province), Gachi village – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: HRANA

  7. 7. Reza Moradi – City of arrest: Songhor (Kermanshah Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  8. 8. Mostafa Golzar – City of arrest: Songhor (Kermanshah Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  9. 9. Mohsen Kamyab – City of arrest: Songhor (Kermanshah Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  10. 10. Mohammad Seyfouri – City of arrest: Songhor (Kermanshah Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  11. 11. Ebrahim Pishvaei – City of arrest: Songhor (Kermanshah Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  12. 12. Morteza Sarhadi – City of arrest: Songhor (Kermanshah Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  13. 13. Amir Mozaheri – City of arrest: Songhor (Kermanshah Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  14. 14. Ahad Seyfouri – City of arrest: Songhor (Kermanshah Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  15. 15. Arman Masoudi – City of arrest: Songhor (Kermanshah Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  16. 16. Setareh Farghei – City of arrest: Songhor (Kermanshah Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  17. 17. Fariborz Abbasi – City of arrest: Songhor (Kermanshah Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  18. 18. Yazdan Faalehgari – City of arrest: Songhor (Kermanshah Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  19. 19. Kamal Mahdavi – City of arrest: Harsin (Kermanshah Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  20. 20. Hassan Rostami Namdari – City of arrest: Kermanshah – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  21. 21. Pouria Bamkhasht – City of arrest: Kermanshah – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa – Notable point: Student

  22. 22. Mahan Dabiripour – City of arrest: Kermanshah – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Kurdpa

  23. 23. Fatemeh Hataminejad – City of arrest: Sabzevar (Razavi Khorasan Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: HRANA

  24. 24. Ahmadreza Farhadi Topkanlou – City of arrest: Sabzevar (Razavi Khorasan Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: HRANA

  25. 25. Mahsa Basir Tavana – City of arrest: Rasht (Gilan Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Released – Source: HRANA

  26. 26. Parsa Ghobakhloo – City of arrest: Tehran – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Amirkabir Newsletter – Notable point: Student

  27. 27. Pezhman Parsa – City of arrest: Shiraz (Fars Province), Yaghtin Street – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: HRANA

  28. 28. Moslem Kamyab – City of arrest: Songhor (Kermanshah Province) – Place of detention: Songhor Prison – Current status: Detained – Source: HRANA

  29. 29. Amirhossein Takbaz – City of arrest: Karaj (Alborz Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: HRANA

  30. 30. Asad Abedi – City of arrest: Yasuj (Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: HRANA

  31. 31. Hamidreza Esmailpour – City of arrest: Bojnord (North Khorasan Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: Baluch Activists Campaign

  32. 32. Sina Mohammadi – City of arrest: Dezful (Khuzestan Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: HRANA

  33. 33. Amirparsa Neshat – City of arrest: Tehran, Shahrak-e Gharb – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Source: HRANA

  34. 34. Nasser Toghiri – City of arrest: Hamedan – Place of detention: The Ministry of Intelligence’s detention facility (Hamedan) – Current status: Detained – Source: HRANA – Notable point: Activist

  35. 35. Hassan Mohammadi Saghai – City of arrest: Behbahan (Khuzestan Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Released – Source: HRANA

  36. 36. Sadrallah Mohammadi Saghai – City of arrest: Behbahan (Khuzestan Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Released – Source: HRANA

Group or Unidentified Arrests

  1. 1. One citizen – City of arrest: Borujerd (Lorestan Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained

  2. 2. Two citizens – City of arrest: Malard (Tehran Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Notable point: Forced confessions

  3. 3. one citizen – City of arrest: Nurabad (Lorestan Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained

  4. 4. ninw citizens – City of arrest: Mehriz (Yazd Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained

  5. 5. onw citizen – City of arrest: Unknown – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Notable point: Forced confessions

  6. 6. one citizen – City of arrest: Baharestan (Tehran Province), Sabz Dasht – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained – Notable point: Under 18, forced confessions

  7. 7. onw citizen – City of arrest: Unknown – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Unknown

  8. 8. onw citizen – City of arrest: Azna (Lorestan Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained

  9. 9. one citizen – City of arrest: Jahrom (Fars Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained

  10. 10. one citizen – City of arrest: Mashhad (Razavi Khorasan Province) – Place of detention: Unknown – Current status: Detained

In Conclusion

Overall, the twelfth day of the protests was marked by the simultaneous convergence of three prominent trends: the continuation of scattered gatherings in numerous cities, the expansion of labor and professional strikes, particularly in Kurdish regions, and the intensification of security pressure accompanied by a new wave of arrests. Alongside these developments, widespread communication disruptions and a nationwide internet shutdown on the twelfth night further constrained the flow of information and intensified the battle over narratives. This combination indicates that, despite repression and restrictions, the protests continue to retain the capacity to regenerate and adapt, both in the streets and within the urban economy.